On Sep 17, 5:16*pm, Jim Kelley wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:
One would first have to presume to know what space is in order to
stipulate the conditions for its existence.

We know space exists and according to quantum physics,
nothing except particles exist. It doesn't take a
rocket scientist to conclude that, if quantum physics
is correct, then space must be constructed of particles
albeit possibly as yet undiscovered and possibly
unmeasurable particles.

And with that you feel that you can claim to know what space 'is'.

It must be just marvelous to be you. *:-)

ac6xg

Jim
If I drew a vacuum on a bottle on earth and then let the black hole
apply its forces upon the innards of the bottle
would it extract any thing more than the operation on earth? I kinda
look at the black hole as the datum level of maximum force
as a reaction to the big bang and that datum is not the same as that
on earth. Thus a vacuum on earth is not a perfect vacuum in terrestial
form. Quite a quandry for me when determining what nothing is and when
a implosion would occur. Frankly Jim I don't feel what nothing is can
be answered
Very best regards
Art