On Sep 18, 7:48*am, Tom Ring wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 17, 8:52 pm, Tom Ring wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
I know books say a lot of things but do they explain WHY current
cannot flow thru the center?
snip
Art
If you do the differential equations, it doesn't say why the center
can't so much as why the skin does. *Similar to gravitation and water
flowing downhill vs uphill. *I'll go into detail if you can't figure it
out. *Or not.

tom
K0TAR

Please do. I would love to see your take on it. I am gratified that
somebody is tackling the problem
hopefully in laymans language so all can benefit. Possibly you could
start another thread as this one is greatly contaminated
I can then respond on my take of the matter and hopefully the flaw
will be exposed.
Regards
Art

I did not mean to imply I would explain the diff eqs. *That would
currently be a lost cause on you, because I am sure that I couldn't put
it in "layman's terms" - you need the math to understand it. *I meant
that I would explain why the 2 situations were similar, or not explain,
depending upon my mood.

To understand the situation, I would suggest that you start down the
calculus road. *The internet has to have tutorials on it. *Differential
equations look terribly obtuse, but they are an obtainable destination
down that road if you choose to follow it.

tom
K0TAR

Tom but I have put in terms of the layman so that should be paradise
to those skilled in mathematicWhen the good Doctor
frm MIT provided the mathemartic showing the correctness of logic I
proposed with respect to Gauss and Maxwellk
mathematics as a route of viability was rejected by all. That really
needs exposure to the group as it is the foundation of radiation.
The computor is a wonderful thing but if an arrow is pointed in the
wrong direction it then becmes useless.
Nearly finished the mowing
Art