On Sep 18, 12:58*pm, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:26:18 GMT, "JB" wrote:
We know that the AC current in the antenna induces an
electromagnetic wave is sufficient for my purpose. *Unless I can find
funding for renewed efforts... *(wink nudge)

Funding is easy these days. *All you need is an anti-terrorism or
disaster link. *For example:
- Use of HF antennas for airport security.
- Antenna design optimized for disaster services.
- Survivable antenna design and construction.
While these topics are contrived, there has been considerable
rethinking of the basics in order to enhance survivability, tampering,
security, terrorist activities, general mayhem, and other post-911
buzzwords. *I'm not sure this extends to basic concepts, but it's
possible. *Something like:
- Re-evaluating E-M concepts in a post 911 world.
- Survey of antenna technology for optimum disaster communications.

You will need to use your imagination because all the obvious studies
have already been taken. *Perhaps combining everything into:
- The effects of global warming, terrorism, economic collapse, and
* natural disasters on antenna technology.
Try to emphasize the positive aspects such as the improved HF antenna
grounding provided by rising sea levels.

--
Jeff Liebermann * *
150 Felker St #D * *http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann * * AE6KS * *831-336-2558

Jeff if you have everything placed before you your enthuseasm will
wain.
There is nothing wrong in exactly following in MY footsteps you have
your own
bag of choices by not being a follower which enables you to challenge
each step of logic.
Fortunately in my case it was the foundation on which I built that was
the subject of
challengr despite evidence opresented to the contrary The foundation
upon which everything rest
is that the supposition of making Gaussian law of statics equal to the
dynamic field of Maxwell only requires the addition of a radiator
and a time varying field such that both are equal in physical and
mathematical form, from which point the details offered provide all
the relavent points of logic.
This group mainly of electrical engineers have been brought up on the
idea that statics are totally divorced from the mechanics of the
electrical curriculum
to the rejection of particle mechanics and towards the idea that
sciences all have diifferent laws to each other. Scientists understand
this but authors
have not got to the stage of placing those findings in books which are
initially provided by followers of science in the hope that some will
carry the flag forward instead of concentration on the accumulation of
wealth. If they can't read it in a book then it is not believable the
same way as a scientific paper will not be accepted that do not
prevail on previous thoughts. Initial thought is thus rejected by the
education of today. Academia will never accept anything
that is not received approval from their peers.
Thus without dragging them forcibly into the acception of change no
change will occur., where as, your expertise in mathematics can test
the logic to its limits which defy opposition
Best regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ.........xg