On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:45:13 -0700, Richard Clark
wrote:

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:12:03 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin
wrote:

So I made a mistake with you

Jeff, from Hero to Zero in 211 posts. It was funny the first time,
now its boring and Art still can't originate a single question with
its answer to prepare an examination that contains "equilibrium."

Yep. That's what I get for trying to be helpful, an ever increasing
and more elaborate word salad of technobabble. My contributions
certainly didn't help. Now I know how Victor Frankenstein felt when
he intended to create life, and ended up instead creating a monster.

This is all one very elaborate Troll.

Yeah, but I'm still jealous. I can't juggle technical terms as well
as Art has demonstrated.

It didn't take much effort to see how the smooth transition between
multiple topics was implemented. No sentence has a single subject or
action. By splicing two disconnected subjects or actions into a
single sentence, each sentence can seamlessly transition from one
topic to another. The next sentence picks up the 2nd subject from the
previous sentence, and then adds a 3rd subject, ad infinitum. That
has the benefit of it being very difficult to refute or even discuss
two subject simultaneously, without first surgically dissecting each
sentence into at least two parts. I attempted to do that in my
previous posting, with only marginal effectiveness.

I think I now have enough material to effectively study the technique.
It should be quite useful for writing business plans, patent
applications, and research reports. I would like to thank Art for the
material and apologize to the other readers for becoming part of the
problem.



--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558