Thread
:
Equilibrium in free space
View Single Post
#
119
September 19th 08, 11:17 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
John Smith
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,915
Equilibrium in free space
wrote:
[loads of chit he hopes will sound authentic and intimidate others into
either shutting up, or agreeing with him ... puzzled-look ]
Actually, the "Luminiferous aether" was too narrow, by its' sheer
definition; Einstein first denied it, then realized it must be replaced
with the gravitational ether and that referencing motion in relation to
gravitational ether has no meaning ... basically, if you give this any
thought at all--this ether exists apart from time and motion, and any
possible meaning of time we could attempt to ascribe to it. (time is
motion, motion is time ...)
Indeed, this is just one property/aspect of this ether which is
speculated on, the ability to jump from a point in it, to a far distant
point in it, in "no time." A "folding of space" in some theories, a
wormhole in others, etc. ...
You are an idiot, you cannot even get that right ... but, we considered
the source, you are forgiven child. :-)
Regards,
JS
Reply With Quote
John Smith
View Public Profile
Find all posts by John Smith