On Sep 17, 4:37*pm, Art Unwin wrote:


Could well be but I have no alternative and am going my own way. Why
should this disturb others?

Because you insist what you say is true without any proof given.
Not to mention that you refuse to even define how you apply
equilibrium
to your "new science" antenna theory.
And now you think you should rewrite perfectly good antenna theory as
it has been known for quite a few years. Again, without any real
proof,
or even coherent logic applied.

But even worse, you think you have all the answers, and that everyone
else here is either brain dead, senile, fell off a turnip truck last
night,
or they bark at the moon while chasing spiders across the lawn of the
Glendale assisted living center, which BTW is how I often envision you
after reading about 492 lines of your equilibribric/neutrino theory.
But otherwise, disturb not do you.