On Sep 28, 12:42*pm, boo-radley wrote:
On Sep 28, 10:05 am, wrote:
And S&L "Keating 5" Conspirator McCain should not "worry"??? *McCain
has NO CREDIBILITY when it comes to accepting gifts from bankers /
lobbyists.
Dennis
A typical Neo-Commie Liberal Fascist propaganda post.
HERE ARE THE FACTS:
The Keating Five were five United States Senators accused of
corruption in 1989, igniting a major political scandal as part of the
larger Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s and early 1990s. The
five senators;
Alan Cranston (D-CA)
Dennis DeConcini (D-AZ)
Donald W. Riegle (D-MI)
John Glenn (D-OH)
John McCain (R-AZ)
were accused of improperly aiding Charles H. Keating, Jr., chairman of
the failed Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, which was the target
of an investigation by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB).
After a lengthy investigation, the Senate Ethics Committee determined
in 1991 that Alan Cranston(D-CA), Dennis DeConcini(D-AZ), and Donald
Riegle(D-MI) had substantially and improperly interfered with the
FHLBB in its investigation of Lincoln Savings.
Senators John Glenn and JOHN McCAIN were CLEARED OF HAVING ACTED
IMPROPERLY.
Only Glenn and McCain ran for re-election, and they were BOTH RE-
ELECTED.
Liar
MCCAIN WAS REPRIMANDED _NOT_ "CLEARED" BY THE SENATE ETHICS COMMITTEE
for acting improperly, he admits it in his biography!-
On MSNBC this week, Newsweek's Jonathan Alter tried to connect John
McCain to the current financial disaster, saying: "If you remember the
Keating Five scandal that (McCain) was a part of. ... He's really
getting a free ride on the fact that he was in the middle of the last
great financial scandal in our country."
McCain was "in the middle of" the Keating Five case in the sense that
he was "exonerated." The lawyer for the Senate Ethics Committee wanted
McCain removed from the investigation altogether, but, as The New York
Times reported: "Sen. McCain was the only Republican embroiled in the
affair, and Democrats on the panel would not release him."
So John McCain has been held hostage by both the Viet Cong and the
[Neo-Communist Liberal Fascist] Democrats.
Alter couldn't be expected to know that: As usual, he was lifting
material directly from Kausfiles. What is unusual was that he was
stealing a random thought sent in by Kausfiles' mother, who, the day
before, had e-mailed: "It's time to bring up the Keating Five. Let
McCain explain that scandal away."
The Senate Ethics Committee lawyer who investigated McCain already had
explained that scandal away -- repeatedly. It was celebrated lawyer
Robert Bennett, most famous for defending a certain horny hick
president a few years ago.
In February this year, on Fox News' "Hannity and Colmes," Bennett
said, for the eight billionth time:
"First, I should tell your listeners I'm a registered Democrat, so I'm
not on (McCain's) side of a lot of issues. But I investigated John
McCain for a year and a half, at least, when I was special counsel to
the Senate Ethics Committee in the Keating Five. ... And if there is
one thing I am absolutely confident of, it is John McCain is an honest
man. I recommended to the Senate Ethics Committee that he be cut out
of the case, that there was no evidence against him."
It's bad enough for Alter to be constantly ripping off Kausfiles. Now
he's so devoid of his own ideas, he's ripping off the idle musings of
Kausfiles' mother.
Even if McCain had been implicated in the Keating Five scandal -- and
he wasn't -- that would still have absolutely nothing to do with the
subprime mortgage crisis currently roiling the financial markets. This
crisis was caused by political correctness being forced on the
mortgage lending industry in the Clinton era.
Before the Democrats' affirmative action lending policies became an
embarrassment, the Los Angeles Times reported that, starting in 1992,
a majority-Democratic Congress "mandated that Fannie and Freddie
increase their purchases of mortgages for low-income and medium-income
borrowers. Operating under that requirement, Fannie Mae, in
particular, has been aggressive and creative in stimulating minority
gains."
Under Clinton, the entire federal government put massive pressure on
banks to grant more mortgages to the poor and minorities. Clinton's
secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Andrew Cuomo, investigated
Fannie Mae for racial discrimination and proposed that 50 percent of
Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low-
to moderate-income borrowers by the year 2001.
Instead of looking at "outdated criteria," such as the mortgage
applicant's credit history and ability to make a down payment, banks
were encouraged to consider nontraditional measures of credit-
worthiness, such as having a good jump shot or having a missing child
named "Caylee."
Threatening lawsuits, Clinton's Federal Reserve demanded that banks
treat welfare payments and unemployment benefits as valid income
sources to qualify for a mortgage. That isn't a joke -- it's a fact.
When Democrats controlled both the executive and legislative branches,
political correctness was given a veto over sound business practices.
In 1999, liberals were bragging about extending affirmative action to
the financial sector. Los Angeles Times reporter Ron Brownstein hailed
the Clinton administration's affirmative action lending policies as
one of the "hidden success stories" of the Clinton administration,
saying that "black and Latino homeownership has surged to the highest
level ever recorded."
Meanwhile, economists were screaming from the rooftops that the
Democrats were forcing mortgage lenders to issue loans that would fail
the moment the housing market slowed and deadbeat borrowers couldn't
get out of their loans by selling their houses.
A decade later, the housing bubble burst and, as predicted, food-stamp-
backed mortgages collapsed. Democrats set an affirmative action time-
bomb and now it's gone off.
In Bush's first year in office, the White House chief economist, N.
Gregory Mankiw, warned that the government's "implicit subsidy" of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, combined with loans to unqualified
borrowers, was creating a huge risk for the entire financial system.
Rep. Barney Frank denounced Mankiw, saying he had no "concern about
housing." How dare you oppose suicidal loans to people who can't repay
them! The New York Times reported that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were
"under heavy assault by the Republicans," but these entities still had
"important political allies" in the Democrats.
Now, at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars, middle-class
taxpayers are going to be forced to bail out the Democrats' two most
important constituent groups: rich Wall Street bankers and welfare
recipients.
Political correctness had already ruined education, sports, science
and entertainment. But it took a Democratic president with a
Democratic congress for political correctness to wreck the financial
industry.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...D-F2FE8EBF3339