Richard Clark wrote:

...
Not in the least necessary from any perspective; but I can see why
some modeling would be impossible to confirm against the data offered.
Afterall, if the prognosis of, say, netzheimers were based on a ±0.1dB
DNA error, then all bets are off in proving sanity.

Knowledge may give weight, but accomplishments
give lustre, and many more people see than weigh.
Lord Chesterfield

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

LOL!

Thanks Richard!

I will place a grain (or two, or more) of salt upon the joint of the
thumb with wrist (and, thinking fondly of you, as reason enough), swag
down the shot of Tequila and touch tongue to the joint ... but for now,
more important things beckon me ...

Ahh yes, if only for a night ... I suppose you will be here tomorrow ...
may your dreams be filled with the such of mine ... here is too our
further "exploits" :-)

Regards,
JS