Cecil Moore wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote:
All it shows is that models can be carelessly or intentionally
constructed in such a way as to cause NEC to malfunction.

SUPRGAIN.EZ was a complete accident from many years ago.
I noticed that the closer together the wires were, the
higher the reported gain. When it got to about 5 dBi
omni, I knew I had done something wrong.

All I was trying to do is show there are certain things
that NEC cannot do. I suspect that modeling Art's antenna
is one of those things.

Let me see, is there a way to "carelessly or intentionally" construct
data into my formula to compute the volume of a sphere to make the
formula "malfunction?"

Nope! Guess that formula is returning valid results! Nice being able
to have real confidence in it! ;-)

Regards,
JS