On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:31:34 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:20:12 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

Let me see, is there a way to "carelessly or intentionally" construct
data into my formula to compute the volume of a sphere to make the
formula "malfunction?"

Nope! Guess that formula is returning valid results! Nice being able
to have real confidence in it! ;-)

What is the volume of a sphere with the measured dimension of
a chord = 1 meter?

That was too easy!


Ahhh, once again that magnificent intellect of yours is displayed ...

However, somehow, it has lost its' shock value ... :-|

Which is to say even with your confidence and your formula that you
don't know. It demonstrates you can neither construct careless nor
careful data. This was anticipated and all would note that Sarah Lee
could answer her own questions even if she couldn't answer others'.
(Did they draft Cecil to Sedona last weekend for her rehearsals?)

Brett, let's just cut to the chase and point out all of your
"objections" to modeling are offered with rather pale logic and even
less demonstrables.

Simpler yet, you are just trolling - but that isn't groundbreaking
news here....

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC