Thread: small antennas
View Single Post
  #63   Report Post  
Old October 7th 08, 01:19 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
[email protected] dfinn1@nc.rr.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2007
Posts: 136
Default small antennas

On Oct 4, 2:12*pm, John Smith wrote:
NM5K wrote:

Yes. But they deal with the real world, not a bunch of conjered up
voodoo science.


Funny you should mention that. *As, when you peek closely under the hood
of the NEC engine (at least the one I use and have the source code to),
it does have a bit of what you call "voodoo science", IMHO ...


Can you believe that? This guy is claiming that the method of moments
is voodoo science! I wonder what is peek under the hood was. What
books did he read? Can he still read books? It's twight time...


Only people with limited room are likely to be interesting
in accepting a decrease in performance, vs using full size
antennas. The only place you see me using small antennas on HF


Don't forget us guys who are over 50 and getting tired of maintaining
large hunks of metal in the sky and fighting the force of gravity Gods
to do so (in more ways than one! *


Not to mention those fierce ether winds.

And, not to mention neighbors, rules,
regulations, etc.) *With the price of real estate being manipulated near
"Hong Kong Prices" (what is that, about a million dollars a sq. ft.?),


I guess "John" has not heard about the real estate crash.

reduced size antennas will only increase in uses and demand ...


That is true because the microwave portions of the spectrum is
becoming so pervasive. But not HF.

Regards,
JS


Sigh....another senility eruption takes its course.