On Oct 9, 5:58*am, Dave wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Oct 8, 6:31 am, Dave wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Oct 7, 11:14 am, Bernard Peters wrote:
-was- (OT) McCant/Palin Banking on low information (Stupid) voters
-
- 50% of voters have an IQ of below 100
-
That is not true. *Most people have an IQ of near 100.

Dave - D'Oh! - Near 100 ain't 100

- Your phrasing suggests that half the people have
- below average intelligence.
-*I disagree with that characterization.
-*Your bell curve has a crack in it.

Dave - My Bell Curve is A-OK
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:IQ_curve.svg

At One Sigma ~68% of the greater population would
be near {close proximity of} the Average/Medium IQ
of ~100.

All of those people would generally be consider to be
of normal Intelligence : 34% above and 34% below
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient

Even at Two ~98% still a the greater potion of the
population would be around {in the area of} Average/
Medium IQ of ~100. : 49% above and 49% below

It is Beyond Two Sigma that IQ's can be considered
as Not So Normal : With that 1% above Plus Two
Sigma consider very-bright "Smart"; and that 1%
below Minus Two Sigma consider as not-so-bright
"Dumb".

Dave - Maybe it is your Bong that has a Crack-in-It ;o) ~ RHF