View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old November 1st 08, 04:21 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Jeff Liebermann[_2_] Jeff Liebermann[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,336
Default Behind the times...

On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:27:47 -0400, "Ed Cregger"
wrote:

Perhaps someone can answer a question or two about synthetic aperture radar
systems. I'm interested in whether or not the flat plate we see as the
receiver antenna actually radiates power, or is a separate transmitter
antenna used? TIA

Ed, NM2K


As others have mentioned, that's not synthetic aperture radar. See
the article at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_aperture_radar
for explanations and references. Note that either the target or the
radar has to be moving for SAR to work. A mess of small transmitters,
scattered over a wide area, will also work. A rotating radar antenna
(phased array, bedspring, or dish) will not work.

One example is the SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission), which used
interferometry and a synthetic aperture radar to map the planet. In
this case, the shuttle was moving and the ground was relatively
motionless.
http://fas.org/irp/program/collect/ifsar.htm
http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/
Since there was only one space shuttle in orbit, the antenna must both
xmit and receive.


--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
#
http://802.11junk.com
#
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS