On Nov 3, 5:57*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

What blows my mind John there is nobody willing to do the math with
respect to my extension of GAUSS

ok, give us your equations. *what EXACTLY have you done to Gauss? *NO HAND
WAVING, write the equations!
No David there is no point going down that path again. Me giving you
an equation
would only add more problems. You surely must be aware of an
arbritary border
format where the contents are in equilibrium, why not play with the
Gaussian law of statics
and learn how such a field becomes handy. Then you change it to a
dynamic field with the addition
of radiators while maintaining equilibrium and then subject everything
to a time varying field.
When you do this for your self it becomes more meaningfull to the user
but you have a real problem that you have to sort out
before you play with any of the electrical laws. You have to review
history to convince yourself that all the masters involved in physics
made the proviso that equilibrium MUST exist for the laws to be valid.
They made this proviso based on the reasoning that our Universe is in
a state of equilibrium and later that every action has an equal and
opposite reaction (Newton) If you do not agree with these principles
then the use of a arbitrary border for a mathematical solution is not
valid.
As far as Dr Davis of MIT who is working for the space agency, he did
everything that was required of him and then left. Several times he
came back to help out members of the group with respect to the
mathematics but it was plain that the group did not welcome his
presence. The private e mail I received from him gave me a lot of
confidence in my findings. What I find exciting is that galactic
particles are finding their way from the Sun to Earth which gives
mechanical content to the subject of radiation as opposed to the
prevailing theory of waves. To me this is more far reaching than just
radiation as it also gives other cycles to these same particles with
an affinity to water and other diamagnetic substances which gives it a
firm connection to storms and tornadoes as well as rotating sea areas
along with tides, all of which involved the four forces of the
Universe which Einstein correctly fore saw radiation as the key for
forward movement in understanding of Classical Physics. I consider
myself very fortunate when going back to the Gaussian fields and
applying a broader mathematic front to his work which he may have well
did for himself if he stayed in the field. Doing this provided so many
clues with respect to radiation and how it is produced which produced
connections to other known phenomina which was well known but now how
a dotted line connection to other things that are well established
such that more extensive research was not required which can be very
difficult to those not involved in the academic field;. For me the
jigsaw is now completed and as history shows change takes a long while
to be accepted certainly by those in academia
but for me it doesn't matter as I feel very smug and fortunate with my
findings which contempt by others cannot eradicate.
Enuff said
Best regards
Art unwin KB9MZ..........XG





It blows my mind when a ham with a doctorate comes along and supplies
the mathematical proof and the math is denied

if i remember right, he added (t) in a place where it wasn't necessary.
then dissappeared. *maybe he decided it was better to not be associated with
your theory? *or is he off writing it up for a Nobel prize for himself???

David take note when your book comes out it may spawn a new science to
rival classical
physics.

not my book, nothing theoretical in it, just practical proven stuff.