View Single Post
  #36   Report Post  
Old November 4th 08, 05:08 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
[email protected] nm5k@wt.net is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 757
Default "Unwashed" hams and "washed" hams

On Nov 2, 5:07*pm, Art Unwin wrote:


What blows my mind John there is nobody willing to do the math with
respect to my extension of GAUSS


Time is up. I'm back from the dirt pile. Let the games continue.
What blows my mind is why a certain whiny Englishman who
moved to the land of Obama, refuses to do his own homework to
show the world.
Why would I want to do work on your dinky dummy load on a stick?
Why would I even *need* to do your work? After all, all is known
regarding antennas according to you. So you should already know
all the details of this mathematical endeavor, and should be prepared
to release them to the unwashed stinky masses.

It blows my mind when a ham with a doctorate comes along and supplies
the mathematical proof and the math is denied
by the guru's on this newsgroup.


Why do you keep lying about the doktor. We all know he didn't provide
any math. If your advanced age has made this hard for you to recall,
I can provide the links to the original thread, which I have already
done
before. Maybe even two or three times. :/

It blows my mind when hams state a conductor must be straight when
they use helicals in so many places yet despite the denials
they will not do the math for themselves but continue to ask me
endless questions so they can continue arguements.


What math might I need to answer whatever question you might
have about coils? You already know everything about antennas,
so why bug us about it?

Then they deny I have such an antenna and an Aussie who obviously
likes to bet offered a wager of what was it $1000 US ?
and nobody took him up on the wager.


I have no idea what you are blabbering about. I know you supposedly
sent one of your designs to another ham on this group for a test
run. We have never heard a single peep as to the results of this
test drive. What say, Mr. Stinky?

Then there are computor programs
that push aside Yagi antennas in favor of those
*in equilibrium which support what I have found and these programs are
designed around Maxwell who is now arpparently losing favor with hams
tho professionals cling to it dearly.


Must be a strong program to be able to push around yagi antennas.
Well, I suppose if the yagi was built for 1.2 ghz, it would be
fairly
easy to push aside. But I suspect it would strain mightily to
push around a HF tri-bander..

I have no problem with Guru's
disagreeing with me but I did expect a morsel or a small challenge
in at least one area other than look up the dictionary for them to get
the definition of equilibrium.


I *know* how the rest of the world describes equilibrium. What
I want to know is how *you* apply this term to antenna theory.
Of course, I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for you to
provide this simple answer.
All you want to do is whine, ****, and moan about the sorry
state of the antenna world as you know it.

And now we have a man who has written a
book
and preferes to tout this piece of trash rather than do the math with
respect to the radiation all on the basis that what he believes is in
a book that he wrote so it must be authentic.


What are you whining about now? I know nothing of your man, and
his book. I've been busy playing in the dirt. I guess I missed the
memo...

David take note when
your book comes out it may spawn a new science to rival classical
physics.


I wouldn't be holding your breath.

It blows my mind that we have threads that break the thousand
mark on reflections or swr and then get repeated again and again
because of disagreements on the substance


Your mind is going to explode if you keep this up. !!!BOOM!!!
Blood and brain matter flying all about.. Another one bites the
dust..

*Now he is toting a later
edition hoping to collect some money from hams.


Money is good. And I can do the math when it comes to $$$.



Give me a break since
he will not do the math that I speak of probably because he can't
handle the difference in units between Gauss and Maxwell.


When are *you* going to do the math?

You know
when OBAMA
wins the election on Tuesday hams will unite and declare McCAIN the
winner


I hope so. Obama sucks so hard, he's likely to implode before he gets
in office. Of course, you'll probably vote for the sorry socialist sum-
bitch,
if you haven't already..
I bet he won't do the math for you either. Sure, he'll tell you
whatever
you want to hear at the moment, but at the end of the day, all you
will have is a dummy load on stick legs. Maybe we should have your
antenna do some squats. :/