November 6th 08, 03:22 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,915
|
|
"Unwashed" hams and "washed" hams
Richard Clark wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:01:24 -0800 (PST), Art Unwin
wrote:
Richard you have not come up with anything that contradicts what I
have apothosized,
"Potential Energy is not in equilibrium."
so says Newton.
"Kinetic Energy is not in equilibrium."
so says Newton.
"Radiation that uses neither, is not radiation."
so says Gauss.
"Radiation is not in equilibrium."
so says Maxwell.
"An antenna receives or transmits radiation."
so says Einstein.
"An antenna is not in equilibrium."
so says Marx (of Hart, Schaffner & Marx).
The math has been proven, and the dead white scientists (and
haberdashers) have spoken from the grave. You have come up with a
contradiction only, and demonstrated nothing that will raise the dead.
No Lazarus Prize will be awarded this year.
In spite of your reference to having apotheosized anything, no, you
don't rise to the pantheon of deity either (not until you can get
those nails out of your hands).
To early for Easter.
73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
.... Almond Joy gots nuts, Mounds don't! :-)
Regards,
JS
|