View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 6th 08, 06:20 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default Just wondering

wrote:
On Nov 5, 8:24 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,

"Burr" wrote:
Does Palin get to keep the 150,000. in cloches?
I guess she can use them in 2012!

She is giving them to charity.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California


You mean, just like she gave back the "earmark" funds for the "bridge
to nowhere" she was in favor of, until she was publically embarassed
about it, and flip-flopped to be against it?

Oh, wait. She never did return those Federal funds. I guess there
were more important things to do than return the money.

I predict a similar outcome unless the press embarasses her into
following through. Typical politician.


DBMcD - Damn You Got It All WRONG .

1st - The Federal Funds came with an express "Exclusion" that they could
not be used for 'The Bridge To Nowhere'.

2nd - The Federal Funds were 'Ear-Marked' for the State of Alaska and
the State of Alaska properly spent them on behalf of the US Citizens
residing in the State of Alaska.

Lawfully and Legally as Required-by-Law ~ RHF