View Single Post
  #117   Report Post  
Old November 13th 08, 09:57 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Dave Dave is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 797
Default "Unwashed" hams and "washed" hams


"Dave" wrote in message
...

"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
On Nov 11, 3:45 pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...
On Nov 10, 7:58 pm, "Frank" wrote:

Knowing that modern day computor programs were formulated
around Maxwells laws
THAT INCLUDE THE WEAK FORCE it would appear an overcheck of the
equilibrium factor should appear when using an optimizer.


Art, show me ONE program that uses the weak force with maxwell's
equations.
or ONE reference to maxwell's equations that say they include the weak
force
interactions (besides your own posts of course).


reply garbage off topic snipped... you are worse than a politician art...
answer the question. show me a program that uses the weak force. i will
guarantee you that nec and ao DO NOT use the weak force. keep searching,
quote the manual, don't make your own assumptions based on what you
believe.



you know, it took me a while, but i have finally figured out art. art is a
politician, and worse than that, he is a democrat. all that talk about
equilibrium should have tipped me off earlier! art is all for the weak
(force) and wants to get everything into equilibrium by taking away from the
strong and giving to the weak. He is also excellent at not answering
questions as most of you may have noticed. his slipperyness is only topped
by our new president, maybe art has been taking lessons from the big chicago
politicians in how not to get pinned down. Just think about it, who else
but a politician could go on this long doing nothing but asserting beliefs,
even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. politicians do
that all the time, they live on repeating sound bites and bumper sticker
slogans for years never saying any more than a dozen words on any particular
topic... and the more they get pressed the more they fall back on the same
repetitive statements. art does exactly the same thing, always falling back
on 'equilibrium', can't you just picture that as a bumper sticker?!?! maybe
if he repeats it long enough he will get voted into some big science post
and get a big grant, after all, if it gets repeated enough if must be right!