On Nov 16, 10:16*am, "Dave" wrote:
"JosephKK" wrote in message

...



On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:31:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Nov 5, 12:01 pm, Art Unwin wrote:

Richard you have not come up with anything that contradicts what I
have apothosized, nothing !

The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling
suggestion below or try again using the search bar above.
Suggestions for apothosized:

* * 1. apotheosis * * * * * * * * 2. hypothesize

Spelling Help Powered by Franklin Electronic Publishers

Now *it is YOU who have a problem.

Yep, just like I said.. Always blame it on the other guy.
It's always his fault. Art is never wrong. What a horses ass.. *:/

Two things.
Why are you still bothering with him? *He loves the attention he is
getting, he is off in some other NG spewing about being the most
responded to poster. *The correct response is to kill file him. I have
only read responses to his posts.
Many of you could benefit by setting your newsreader to quote
correctly. *Outhouse Express can do it, it may even do it by default.

art is fun! *he gives me something to laugh at when the wx is bad.

usually oe does quote properly, but something is different about art's
posts, they must be in a format that oe doesn't like so it won't
automatically indent and quote them.

David
There is something odd about that post. I have not been dabbling in
other newsgroups other than a short stint
on Eham. I have not stated that I get more resposes than anybody else
on the net. So I really don't know where he is coming from
I have no problem in people killing my file as that would leave people
who want to discuss antennas instead
of staying purely for insults and argueing reasons. Perhaps he is one
of the kb9.... group that are intent on destroying newsgroups
before somebody divulges where he lives so that people can decide how
to react. Maybe when the table turns on him he will ponder
if his behaviour justified the response he gets!

Now back to antennas, how can one determine if current does or does
not flow in the centre of a conductor? by separating It was the basis
of equilibrium of a radiator
that allowed the use of Newtrons law to determine that if a charge
does not move in sync with the current then no current can be flowing
thru the center.
Nobody used Newtons laws in the case of a fractional wavelength
antenna.
but of a bound electron breaking away from the orbits of the material.
This thinking says that a antenna will dissapate over time so we must
consider the possibility of an unbound electron at rest upon the
surface which brings us back to the Newton domain Is it beyond the
sensabilities to see it as an action and a reacgtion between the
settlement of particles on a surface and the reaction to this action
by the application of current which provides a reactionary field. This
idea of waves moving along with the current flow and various other
ideas put forward by the likes of book authors seems to be a never
ending attempt to provide substanced to a long ago thought out bad
theory which would be disrupted if current was observed to flow in the
centre of a radiator
Regards
Art
Art