RadioBanter - View Single Post

Dave[_18_] · November 19th 08, 02:08 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna

Dave wrote:
wrote:
David G. Nagel wrote:
wrote:
David G. Nagel wrote:

The last time that I built an antenna I used the formula to get the
appropriate length then I had to adjust it to obtain the optimal
readings for the frequency I was using.
Did "the formula" take into account any insulation, conductor
resistivity,
conductor diameter, height above ground, characteristics of the ground,
and objects in the near field including supports?

If not, what is your point?

The point is that those items are not part of "Antenna Theory: The
Science" but are a large part of "Antenna theory: The Art". Art has
been talking as if they are one and the same.

Science is fully accounting for all variables and their effects giving
you exact answers.

Art is experience and rules of thumb that get you close enough.

As I understand it, science is trying ideas out to see what happens in
the real world. That would involve "experience" to a certain degree, as
an "educated guess" is involved in the design of the experiment.

And one could say the "design of the experiment" could be an art.