On Nov 22, 9:32*am, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...
On Nov 21, 4:07 pm, "Dave" wrote:

"Art Unwin" wrote in message

....

the law that I continually state from the
extension of the Gaussian law of statics which I derived.

you haven't presented anything that you derived... state the equation.
Oh come on David I do not work for you, do it for yourself as you have
superior background than I do.

finally he got something right!

If you are proficient in mathematics check out the addition of
displacement current of Maxwell and review it as just that.

it works fine for me as is... no weak force, no magic levitating neutrinos,
just a displacement current.

a current in circular foirm that DOES generate a displacement
magnetic field such that it displaces a charged particle
from the surface of the radiator.

bull!

This eddy current has the units of
current which somehow would match the
description of the "weak force:".

eddy currents don't require weak force, nor displacement currents, they are
perfectly well described by existing magnetic field and conduction
equations.

You stated previously that you wanted to know
where the weak current equation is so, now you can start on a series

not me, i know where the weak 'force' is, and it has nothing to do with
electrical currents even though it is sometimes refered to as the
electro-weak force. *that is a throwback to a VERY short time after the big
bang when the forces were merged, right now, unless you are experimenting
with a supercollider you can ignore the weak force as far as electric fields
are concerned.

Stae equation you ask?

handwaving bs snipped

yes, state your equation that you 'derived'.

Ofcourse you can declare antenna computer programs are in error and
salvage your credability or place such a statement in the practicable
book that you are writing! After all if it is printed in a book it
must be right.......right?

but the computer programs that exist today, and DON'T use the weak force in
anyway are perfectly in tune with maxwell's equations. *and my book doesn't
mention them at all, so don't hold your breath for that.

You must be older than I thought, you never are going to change.
Before you fade away
this last bit that you are now supporting regarding the weak force.
Can you account for every action
that reside in Maxwells laws including his addition? Can you state
that without doubt that eddy currents do not exist
during radiation? Or more importantly, that Maxwell's laws also omit
the presence of the eddy current?
Are you still of the opinion that radiation is a wave which implies a
string of connected energies instead of individual particle ejection?
Then pray tell me how exactly does the transmition of communication
eminate from a radiator and do a reverse action
in the transportation of intelligence? And then comes the biggy, How
does the Universe exist without being in equilibrium
a term you resist with abandon. Your knee jerk reactions to me are
starting to be absurd but as you are unemployed
you do not need now to answer to anybody regarding the thoughts of an
old man or concern yourself of the possibility of being fired.
Art