View Single Post
  #50   Report Post  
Old November 24th 08, 03:58 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Art Unwin Art Unwin is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
Default Displacement current

On Nov 24, 12:21*am, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Nov 23, 9:18 am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Richard Harrison wrote:
If Cecil were asked where a reflection occurs on an antenna or a
transmission line, I`d wager he would reply, at the same place the
impedance discontinuity occurs.
Yep, and if one impedance is infinite (or zero or purely
reactive), the magnitude of the reflection coefficient
is |1.0|, i.e. 100% reflection.
--
73, Cecil *http://www.w5dxp.com


Ceci
If the surface of a conductor is completely covered by precharged
particles
and is aprouched by a changing electrical field would it not it be
opposed by the
electric field pre placed on the surface? Would the difference between
*...
Best regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG (uk)


When we return to college, get a job in the physics lab, become friends
with the head of the department, etc. ... we will pose your question,
and suggest an experiment(s) to explore all this ...

In the meantime, GET REAL!

Regards,
JS


John
Academia does not accept studies from outside the club. The same goes
for the IEE and the IEEE
and ofcourse QST,radcom and the like. The internet is full of stories
where certain institutions have basically censored free speech for
years an action that is now continually exposed because of the
available of the Internet .I know it wears on the nerves on people
when I keep on hammering the point home= but it does find a place in
the record
But a long time ago this group stated that they would put down all old
wives tales. Problem was that many then took on the mantle of a pseudo
experts
which led to strong and petty auguments to real experts who passed by
and never stayed for long. So I took them on without backing down when
I had control of the facts knowing full well eventually they would be
seenj for what they really are by those passing by. I think that now I
have beat the naysayers into the ground where the facts provided
cannot be defeated unless existing laws were mangled in the effort.
Everybody on this group should now have a full understanding of what
my investigation provided whether they believe it or not or like it or
not. Nobody pointed out any conflict with present day laws which they
would have jumped on if they were aware of them so I am now satisfied
I have achieved my object of showing to all their true colours so
basically I am done.
At the moment I am finishing up a new antenna of some 20 foot long
with a dish reflector in the hope of attaining a rifle shot type of
directive antenna.
Since my tower at the moment is limited to a 30 foot height I will be
looking more at 20 M rather than the top band even tho it will be
operable on that band
I am also adding with the hope it will work, an automatic tuning
system as part of the antenna which will really push things to the
limit. Scaled optimized computor studies show that the antenna has
good gain but it is very difficult to narrow the beam width on more
than a few frequencies which I am sure the closeness to ground will
cloud the issue.
Best regards
Art Unwin...KB9MZ.......xg (uk)