View Single Post
  #189   Report Post  
Old November 27th 08, 01:59 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
JosephKK[_2_] JosephKK[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 56
Default "Unwashed" hams and "washed" hams

On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:14:23 -0600, (Richard
Harrison) wrote:

Art wrote:
"Einstein may well have been correct even tho not aware of discovries
found after his death."

Wouldn`t anyone like to be aware of all the discoveries made before his
death?

Einstein said something like: "Keep it simple, but not too simple!"

Scientists have in many instances followed Einstein`s advice and reduced
things to simplest terms. Maxwell`s equations as simplified and
explained by Heaviside have been used to successfully predict EM
behavior for a century.


Just to be picky, Heaviside predates Einstein:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Heaviside

They give the answers needed so there has been
no great search for a replacement.

The research at CERN on colliding beams is more likely of interest to
those working with ionizing radiation than to those working with the
nonionizing type we use in radio telecommunications.

There is and was agreement among many with Kraus when he wrote on page
37 of the 3rd edition of "Antennas":
"Although a charge moving with uniform velocity along a straight
conductor does not radiate, a charge moving back and forth in simple
harmonic motion along the conductor is subject to acceleration (and
deceleration) and radiates."

An interesting view of the mechanism of radiation is given by B.
Whitfield Griffith, Jr. on page 315 of "Radio-Electronic Transmission
Fundamentals".

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI