Richard Clark wrote:
You have the cogent characteristics of my model, now demonstrate your
suggestion by showing its incorrect feature(s).

You gave no characteristics of the NEC construction and settings for
your model (cogent or otherwise), as I did for mine. You only stated
the results you say you got.

Even Roy Lewallen wrote that he will look into the correspondence of
my EZNEC solution with the FCC value for those conditions -- which Roy
probably wouldn't choose to do if there was good agreement between
them, or my "near field" model was obviously incorrect to him.

RF