View Single Post
  #124   Report Post  
Old November 29th 08, 01:11 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.religion.christian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.republicans,alt.news-media
David Hartung David Hartung is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2008
Posts: 61
Default (OT) : How Liberals Define : The Separation of Church and Statein America Today.]

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:28:54 -0600, David Hartung
wrote:

It is patently wrong for a religious dominated person
to control public officials with threats and
retaliation. Immoral as hell, BTW

Why would it be more immoral for a "religious dominated person" to
control public officials with threats, and okay for a "non-religious
dominated person" to do so?


Constitutional proscriptions


There are no constitutional proscriptions against private relifios
organizations engaging in partisan political activity.

His network is (probably) tax exempt


So?