Thread
:
Shutting Down Dissent
View Single Post
#
124
November 29th 08, 01:11 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.religion.christian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.republicans,alt.news-media
David Hartung
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2008
Posts: 61
(OT) : How Liberals Define : The Separation of Church and Statein America Today.]
wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:28:54 -0600, David Hartung
wrote:
It is patently wrong for a religious dominated person
to control public officials with threats and
retaliation. Immoral as hell, BTW
Why would it be more immoral for a "religious dominated person" to
control public officials with threats, and okay for a "non-religious
dominated person" to do so?
Constitutional proscriptions
There are no constitutional proscriptions against private relifios
organizations engaging in partisan political activity.
His network is (probably) tax exempt
So?
Reply With Quote
David Hartung
View Public Profile
Find all posts by David Hartung