View Single Post
  #143   Report Post  
Old November 29th 08, 08:50 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.religion.christian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.republicans,alt.news-media
CharlesTheCurmudgeon CharlesTheCurmudgeon is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 9
Default (OT) : How Liberals Define "Troll"-----we call it HARTUNG


"David Hartung" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 07:09:18 -0600, David Hartung
wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:26:32 -0600, David Hartung
wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:15:19 -0800 (PST), RHF
wrote:

Real Americans support Equal Political Rights for
both Believers {Persons-of-Faith} and Non-Believers
{Secularist}.
Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Bob Jones, David Dobson
sure as **** don't.
Evidence?

Their mission is to replace all secularists with
"believers" and to change the function of government
from secular to doctrinal----(fundamentalist, of
course)
On this we likely agree.

Pat Robertson chalkboarded his entire strategy for
doing so after his last defeat in a primary
Presidential election.
Cite?
Told you before

If you want to discuss CURRENT EVENTS, you have to be
aware of them

Pat Robertson gave a series of lectures on the 700 club
noting his agenda and not disbanding his campaign staff
in order to push the goal of electing religious
republicans to all levels of public office

Lastly, even a fruitcake like you knows that it's not
just something I made up----and evade the truth because
you know it's correct.
It may be correct, Robertson is certainly capable of doing something
like this.

You have a long track record of posting claims that you cannot support,



You have a long track record of requiring "cites" for
things that are historically accepted, matters of
public record, or a host of other things that most
normal, educated, well-informed people have no trouble
accepted as fact

You're they type that would deny most of what Nixon, or
Reagan did in their criminal adminstrations because
either you can't remember, hate the fact it's true, or
just were too stupid to pay attention


You might be surprised to know that I see Nixon's coverup of criminal
activity as the thing which destroyed his presidency.

You counter everything by saying "cite"---which is
evasive.

The litany of untruth, lies, stories, innuendo,
conjecture, theory, rumors that your side leveled at
clinton were so bizarre, out of place, unbelievable
that it was embarassing to have to deal with you turds
who bought it


Now it is you who is ignoring fact.

Jerry Falwell made a Video that compiled a mountain of
outright lies, testimonials by paid "witnesses" and you
can't even remember it-----skating over the fact that
was part of the rightwing, religious reich's railing
against the Clintons


You might be aware that I am not defending Falwell.

You ignored all of Reagan's criminal activities,
impeachable offenses---even in the face of the facts
and highly credible allegations (which eventually were
proven)


You have no idea what I may have "ignored" during the Reagan
Administration.

Yet your entire character shows when public events,
common knowledge, and logical/credible things are
laid before you, you THEN demand "cites


I learned long ago that even commonly known events take on different
character, depending on who is relating the event.

You're nothing more than a troll, and it's not just Me
that says it, Hartung


Your point?

Everyone who whacks you across the snout says the same
thing

you're a miserable, sleazy troll

For me, you're comic relief


Funny, I have much the same opinion of you.

By the way, when did you drop out of high school?


hasn't started yet. They don't usually let you into
high screwel until age 14.

Sir Charles the Curmudgeon