On Dec 1, 6:33*am, David Hartung wrote:
Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Dave wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 07:11:12 -0600, David Hartung
wrote:

There are no constitutional proscriptions against private
relifios organizations engaging in partisan political activity.

If they are tax exempt under religious affiliation,
yep.

If an organization is subsidized by government it cannot use its
power help shape that government. *That is a conflict of interest..

if that is true, then NPR must stop doing political commentary. Such
would be a great loss.

NPR is content neutral.

I beg to differ with you. I listen to NPR on a daily basis. They are
one of the most informative, yet left wing media sources on the radio.

"Left wing"? *How so?

Listen to morning edition commentary some time.

Listen to some of the so called experts they have on.

leftism is the rule of the day.

NPR & PBS Bias # 1 Panels :

NPR's {PBS's} Un-Fair and Un-Balanced is having a
Liberal Activist Proponent and a Moderate {Me-Too
or Well-I-Don't Know} on one of their discussion panels.

What is Missing [MIA] at NPR {PBS} is a real honest
Conservative Activist Proponent who clearly articulates
the Right Perspective on Issues -versus- a Moderate
that is there only as window dressing.

NPR & PBS Bias # 2 The Host and Moderators :

There are All liberal, Liberal. LIBERALS !
= Slanted Questions
= Slanted Follow-Ups

NPR 2400+ "Public" Radio Stations Promoting
Left-Wing 'Liberal' Propaganda ~ RHF

-ps- paid for by tax free {tax payer} donations
which is de-facto us government support for a
left-wing 'liberal' propaganda.