On Dec 3, 10:17*am, Bernard Peters wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:07:41 -0800, RHF wrote:
On Dec 2, 7:37*pm, Bernard Peters wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:04:35 -0500, dxAce wrote:
none wrote:
dxAce wrote:
Well, Mr. Butt-inski, maybe you can provide 2 examples of NPR
slanting news reporting to promote a political position.

Surely YOU can provide 2 examples...

The examples are there, just do a bit of critical listening. I know
that that may be difficult for the knuckle dragging, I'm a victim,
toting crowd, but hey, give it a try.

- From the prospective of a FOKKKs news viewer, - all the media will be
slanted. Perhaps you need a - different perspective to make your
judgments from?


- - Bernard Peters,
- - You K-lose for the use of made-up word "FoKKKs"
- - with the implication of Racism and Bigotry of the
- - Letters "KKK" added to the Argument.

- But, like a typical republiCANT,
- you missed the f&*king message!

BP - More 'typical' make-up words : "republiCANT"
and talk about "you missed the f&*king message!"
* Can't Talk About The C-Issues
* Can't Deal With The C-Facts
Instead Make-Up Words and Resort to C-Name C-Calling.

You K-lose for the use of made-up word "FoKKKs"
with the implication of Racism and Bigotry of the
Letters "KKK" added to the Argument.

This is the 'KKK' Insertion Rule and the first one to
invoke the "KKK" K-loses the K-arguement Kause
they haven't got a Klue as to the K-issues or the
K-facts but they sure do K-know how to mindlessly
K-name Kall someone else : K-which simply shows
their own inner bias and distorted sense of reality.