On Dec 6, 6:31*am, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...
On Dec 5, 8:09 pm, John Smith wrote:

I know of nobody familiar with the present antenna
programs who can explain the addition of the "'Weak force" that creats
arrays in equilibrium without a hint of parallelism or planar
construction. Have all the antenna computer programmers also died or
do they *have a quiet distrust of their work with respect to Maxwell ?

nope, us programmers are perfectly happy, you on the other hand should
completely distrust any computer program modelling antennas out there...
NONE of them include the weak force, therefore they should not be trusted to
model your magical equilibrium antennas. *you must go off and find a
different way to calculate your antenna patterns that does include the weak
force.

Now we have the relevalation that Neutrinos DO actually have mass
obtained frtom the Sun which puts another nail in the coffin with
respect to waves.

the only place that has been revealed is to your in your delusional dreams.
go publish that in a peer reviewed scientific journal and see how many cups
of coffee it gets you.

No Siree, it has been several years that the idea of Neutrinos without
mass was squashed.
Two years ago it was again confirmed in experiments in Batavia,
Illinois. And ofcourse it gives CERN
its impetus for their current experiments in Switzerland
Pull yourself together David As for publishing academics require a
reference lists of quotes from other members of academia
and are loath to challenge prior papers and academics. Thus to be
published you must stay on the same track as others
with no going back for solid review. History shows that papers
supplied by non members of academia will never be accepted in their
life time.
That is why I say papers should be open source and open to challenge
from those outside academia.
Art