On Dec 9, 12:53*pm, (Richard Harrison)
wrote:
Art wrote:

"When Maxwell inserted the required units to acheive equilibrium per
Newton it was the mathematics that forcast the presence of a levitation
force that would not be identified for several decades but still ignored
because of the dominance of wave theory."

Maxwell found his equations had the form of those predicting behavior of
water waves and they correctly predicted the velocity of light as
previously determined.

This seems a distortion of the facts. The addition was seen as the
forces between
current and the force between static particles which was in fact a
confirmation of the the speed of light.
My understanding of the term eddy current with respect to waves was
that it was ,made much later.
But the realization of the connection to light should have really
been recognised by Maxwell as a displacement of particles
and not waves since the presence of particles is predetermined. This
lack of understanding alsio helped the incorrect determination of
light
being a formation of waves instead of particles. This by the way also
cements the validity of changing Gauss's law of statics to a dynamic
field to equate with Maxwells laws which also confirms the presence of
particles. Another correlation to my theory is the interaction of
particles with the Earths magnetic field to produce Aurora or Northern
Lights i.e. particles bombardmentnot waves, Same goes for light
created at the center of a tornado which in itself
is the "eddy current" of a storm where againb light is seen as a
lightning strike where particles plus moisture is drawn into the
stratoshere an d then become separated. The evidence just piles up
that radio communication, radar and light itself is that which comes
from particles ala Neutrinos and NOT from the formation of magnetic or
electrical waves. And that Einstein was correct in his assertion that
radiation held the key for the Universal laws of all the sciences of
nature.Later when Foucalt discovered "Eddy current" which he
associated with water eddy currents it then came into use as a non
destructive material measurement system together with use in aluminum
sorting in scrap yards which in essence is a macro demonstration of
particle presence in radiation., again a vindication that the Maxwell
addition was wrongly assumed a wave structure.
I won't comment on your following statements as it is lost on me why
you have quoted them and the point of stating them








Maxwell was a mathematician and a physicist who searched for things with
practical applications. In one of Maxwell`s lectures he said: "Now,
Professor Graham Bell, the inventor of the telephone, is not an
electrician who found out how to make a tin plate speak, but a speaker,
who to gain his private ends, has become an electrician."

Maxwell`s equations are adequate to solve all questions of radio waves
at once in place of a multitude of their predecessors. Art even agrees
they work as a basis for antenna programs in computers however he spells
computer. Using the tried and proven until something better comes along
is common sense.

From what i`ve seen, wave theory works well for large scale predictions
while the particle theory seems to work at the atomic scale. Too bad
Cern had an instantaneous multimillion dollar breakdown.

A.G. Bell produced the most valuable patent in history. What are the
results of the Unwin patents?

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI * *