View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 27th 08, 02:32 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default IBOC : Side-by-Side : Digital FM HD-Radio Does Sound Better ThanAnalog FM Radio To The Average FM Radio Listener

On Dec 26, 5:01*pm, Dave wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 26, 6:14 pm, Dave wrote:
You're wrong. *The compression scheme used by HD has lots of artifacts.- Hide quoted text -


Your brain and ears have a lot of artifacts.


Sez yer momma.



IBOC : Side-by-Side : Digital FM HD-Radio Does Sound
Better Than Analog FM Radio To The Average FM Radio
Listener.

Never Forget That : We are the 3%~5% of Radio Listeners :
Who are so-called Technical Experts and Distant Radio
(DXers) -aka- Radio Fanatics . . . [: RF Techies :]

BUT - Also Remember that the 'other' 95%~97% of Radio
Listeners are "Local" {Only} Radio Listeners who only have
a few Local Radio Stations that they "Love-To" "Listen-To"
-and- To Them FM HD-Radio does SOUND Better [.]

Better To What ? - To Them It Sound Better Than the old
FM 'Analog' Radio and other comparison is simply not valid
to them : FM Radio is FM Radio; and that is the Standard
that their Ears Judge [.]

Please Note - That these comments are 'only' directed to
FM HD-Radio and 'not' AM HaHaDoh {HD} Radio :---{{{{{

deal with the reality that 'we' do not count in the
great game of the am & fm radio business~ RHF