IBOC : Side-by-Side : Digital FM HD-Radio Does Sound Better ThanAnalog FM Radio To The Average FM Radio Listener
On Dec 26, 5:01*pm, Dave wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 26, 6:14 pm, Dave wrote:
You're wrong. *The compression scheme used by HD has lots of artifacts.- Hide quoted text -
Your brain and ears have a lot of artifacts.
Sez yer momma.
IBOC : Side-by-Side : Digital FM HD-Radio Does Sound
Better Than Analog FM Radio To The Average FM Radio
Listener.
Never Forget That : We are the 3%~5% of Radio Listeners :
Who are so-called Technical Experts and Distant Radio
(DXers) -aka- Radio Fanatics . . . [: RF Techies :]
BUT - Also Remember that the 'other' 95%~97% of Radio
Listeners are "Local" {Only} Radio Listeners who only have
a few Local Radio Stations that they "Love-To" "Listen-To"
-and- To Them FM HD-Radio does SOUND Better [.]
Better To What ? - To Them It Sound Better Than the old
FM 'Analog' Radio and other comparison is simply not valid
to them : FM Radio is FM Radio; and that is the Standard
that their Ears Judge [.]
Please Note - That these comments are 'only' directed to
FM HD-Radio and 'not' AM HaHaDoh {HD} Radio :---{{{{{
deal with the reality that 'we' do not count in the
great game of the am & fm radio business~ RHF
|