On Dec 28, 12:27*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

As far as a dish reflecter is concerned that has been built around the
necessity of a focal point in the phase changing aproach provided by
inductive interactive elements and does not follow the same aproach
required by the addition of the levitating weak force known as the
Foucalt current

ah, so your old theory with the magical levitating diamagnetic neutrinos was
wrong and now you are using a phase change approach (whatever that may be)
and inductive interactions (which i thought you disliked because that is
part of how a Yagi-Uda array works). *if the magical levitating diamagnetic
neutrinos is good enough for one antenna, why isn't it good enough for this
one??? or are you admitting you are totally wrong?

David,
you are building an auguement on sand like "have you stopped beating
your wife?"
You can traverse the world with a steel antenna using less than a watt
with the same message
as a Kw from a huge antenna. The only difference is that one system
provides less samples
of communication for the ear bone requires to decifer. This being
under ideal conditions which are rarely the situation.
I have never disliked the Yagi antenna but I refuse to belief that the
gains enjoyed are absolute because they ignore
the implications of the weak force or eddy currents.They are easily
built. They give close approximations in terms of gain
But the gains supplied do not equate in absolute terms upon which
science rests.
Art