View Single Post
  #103   Report Post  
Old December 29th 08, 02:38 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) Antennas -versus- Amateur RadioAntennas

On Dec 28, 6:24*pm, Dave wrote:
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*Dave wrote:


Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*Dave wrote:


RHF wrote:


Dave,


IIRC a good Amateur Radio 1/4 WL Vertical-Up-Leg
by 1/4 WL Horizontal-Out-Arm {Inverted "L" Antenna
requires very little Tuning and performs very well near
and far on the HF Band that it is 'cut' to use on.
Using a direct-connect or 1:1 UnUn at the Feed-Point
* Half-Wave Inverted "L" Antenna : 1/4 WL + 1/4 WL


Where-as the more common Shortwave Listener (SWL)
type of {Random Wire} Inverted "L" Antenna is un-equal
and usually has a shorter Vertical-Up-Leg and a longer
Horizontal-Out-Arm of at least 1V-to-2H and often
1V-to-3H or more. *Using a 9:1 Matching Transformer
and Ground Rod at the Feed-Point which is at the base
of the Vertical-Up-Leg.


"Random" implies otherwise. *Instead of a 9:1 UnUn, imagine one of these
at the feed point:


http://www.mfjenterprises.com/Produc...ductid=MFJ-927


I enjoy playing with these kind of things. *So I got a license to
transmit. *Some call that "elitist", I call it self-indulgent.


I would just call it following your interests.


Remote tuners are the right way to do things. Much better than a tuner
in the shack.


A tuner in the shack matches the radio to the transmission line. *There
is still a mismatch at the feedpoint.


Exactly. Then the transmit energy ends up heating the coax to the
antenna and components in the tuner. sarcasm on As a bonus you get RFI
in the shack. Another bonus is high voltage at points in the coax to the
antenna where you could have a flashover condition. Sarcasm off


A tuner at the antenna is a much better setup. You are doing things
right. Most HAM's don't. When Mr. Smith imagines doing this he does it
wrong.


- He's right, too. *My sloper is resonant but
- I still use a tuner to protect the transceiver.
-*I was going to use the Remote Autotuner but
- don't need it. *I get a decent match even on 160.

-IF- Your main objective is to protect the Transceiver
-then- a Tuner in the Radio-Shack will do that.
-however- If your main objective is to 'optimize' your
Transmitting Signal : Then a Tuner at the Antenna's
Feed-Point will do that better. ~ RHF