On Dec 29, 1:36*pm, Roy Lewallen wrote:
J. B. Wood wrote:

Hello, Roy, and while the above is certainly correct, you're probably
wasting your time. *Many folks like to fashion their own "reasonable"
explanations even when they're completely off track (should I mention the
CFA again?). *Of course they're always right and it's the rest of the
world who's wrong. *Certain folks on this ng appear to be in constant need
of validation. *Persons without some knowledge of the underlying physics
and applied math are destined to reach the wrong conclusions IMO. *Of
course that's not going to stop some from building a CFA because as we all
know it's the standard comms antenna used at the Groom Lake facility to
keep in touch with Klaatu. *Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,

John Wood (Code 5550) * * * *e-mail: * * * * * * * * * *
Naval Research Laboratory
4555 Overlook Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20375-5337

If what you say is true, I am wasting my time. But I believe there's a
more diverse group of readers:

1. The people who already already know and understand what I'm explaining;
2. The people who think they know and understand what I'm explaining,
but don't, and won't change their minds no matter what I write; and
3. The people who are willing to read and understand what I write, and
learn from it or at least think about it.

Just like medical triage, only one of the three groups can be helped, in
this case #3. It's for those folks that I take the time to post. I hear
from them in various ways from time to time, so I know they're out
there. And I'm glad to pass along to them what I've learned, when I can.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Roy,
That is exactly how I felt when I declared that the addition of a
radiator
to a Gaussian statics field under the application of a time varying
field equates to the
mathematics of Maxwells laws. Nobody, including you, showed an error
in that thinking.
Another person provided the mathematics that proved my point again ,
nobody could disprove it.
Anybody can view the book by Ramo and co "Fields and waves in
communication Engineering"
where in Appendix 11 where the a sample method of tackling the proof
is available in it's entirety.
Some could even read the chapter on radiastrion which spells out
problems with the existing aproach.
Remember when the presence of particles on a radiator is determined by
any person well versed in mathematics
and science then the true vehicle of communication is thus determined.
All of the above is directly
applicable to the stance in words only that you have expressed above
but..........no action
It blows my mind when people desert from mathematics and science in
efforts to prevent change.
T,here is no evidence what so ever that Newton's laws applicable in
this case has now been discarded in science
and that evidence destroys the notion of communication and the
emmission of light can be attributed to a field wave form
instead of the particles outlined in Gaussian law.
Art