"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
I bought that book because you refered to it some time ago where you
misrepresented
what you alluded to and now you are doing it again.

misrepresented??? its right in the book, compare those two formula, are
they not the same? is not guass's law, which is a time invarient equation
directly in maxwell's equations??

In your method of
reading did the law that a radiator can be any shape, size or
elevation as long as it is in equilibrium?

if you can find where 'equilibrium' is a required condition in maxwell's
equations, give me the reference in the book. otherwise you are out of
equilibrium.

I can't conceive that a
mathematition of Maxwells staturer could have missed that observation
if as you say he extended gaussian law of statics. Perhaps you have an
answer for that also of the back of your head.

sure, he didn't 'extend' it... he used it verbatum as the book shows. there
is no need to 'extend' it, its a perfectly good law as it is stated and has
been for many years.

our positions continue to be absurd from an engineering point of view
and nobody as yet has confirmed your position and what is really wierd
none have denied

because they are enjoying laughing at your absurd positions as much as i am!