On Jan 4, 4:44*pm, (Richard Harrison) wrote:
Art wrote:

"I recognise that with the above atatements I am overturning facts that
are accepted where all the statements is a continuity of showing that
the law of statics when made into a arbitrary dynamic field in
equilibrium provides of equilibrium and particles together with particle
spin provided by the action of the weak force in the science of
radiation."

Bafflegab! Who needs it?

Clayton R. Paul and Syed A. Nasar on page 2 of "Introduction To
Electromagnetic Fields":
"In 1864, Maxwell proposed "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic
Field" and thus unified the experimental researches of over a century
through a set of equations known as Maxwell`s equations. These equations
were later verified experimentally by Hertz in 1887. It is generally
accepted that all macroscopic electromagnetic phenomena are governed by
Maxwell`s equations."

No corrections or addenda are needed.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI *

Bull.
Maxwell made an addition to the laws provided.
It was this addition he was lauded for. The addition he made
was to bring the formula suplied to him for condensing by justifying
the = sign
which is required for mathematics to show equilibrium exists and
Newtons law was being followed.
What he did was to ensure that all the units designated added up to
zero. To do this he added the Maxwell correction
which he named as the displacement current now designated as the root
of skin depth resistance.
It was decades later that Foucault found a match that satisfied the
metrics that Maxwell addedto satify the requirements of mathematics.
Maxwell supplied no evidence of experimentation of his own at that
time and was functioning as a mathematician
in the condensing of laws established by others via
experimentation ,.
the majority of which were seen to be duplicates.
I have read nothing that disputes the above account tho the lack of
communication during those times suggest that it was others
like Heaviside and Green and many others were the owners of various
discoveries such that arrangements were changed to disguise theft.
This same problem is still occuring in academia where a scientist was
laid off after a discovery he made and the remaining two scientists
took ownership of this years Nobel prize..
Some books condense this history by ommision but these acts do not
rewrite history or apply redactions to the white paper he wrote
that still exists.Now Richard, if your posting was made to suggest
something else you are welcome to respond.