View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
Old January 16th 09, 01:31 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Frank[_9_] Frank[_9_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 23
Default Contrary current flow within a radiator

Frank,
It has not yet been proven that current does not flow thru the center
of a radiator.


I thought I did prove it at:
http://www3.telus.net/nighttrainexpr...in%20depth.htm
Or are you saying that the developers of FEM software at Ansoft,
CST Microwave, and many others do not know what they
are doing? FEM software (and NEC) has been verified countless
times experimentally. Are you saying that nobody knows how to
use test equipment. Check out the testimonials for CST at:
https://www.cst.com/Content/Company/Testimonials.aspx
In fact there is a procedure that will measure the distribution
of current through a cylindrical conductor.

I see it as a manufactured statement to satisfy the idea of an
uncompleted circuit where the current
passes over or thru and in a different direction than the same current
that generates its existence !
It does all this where the books state it is a series circuit where
the paths taken by the current are not identical. Why manufacture all
these happenings to prove what is just a theory, while at the same
time destroying the reasoning of a closed circuit without an
explanation how such actions
creat radiation, especially when it is admitted that radiation is not
fully understood?


It sounds like you are confusing this with a DC circuit.

I think the time as come to review again from the time of Maxwell and
build up afresh in line with
a century of findings and then re evaluate.
A good start would be to evaluate why antenna programs based on
Maxwells laws provide solutions based on equilibrium while discarding


How do you know the programs are based on "Equilibrium"? --
Whatever that means. Can you provide any mathematical or
experimental evidence. Since you have admitted you do not
understand high school math how can you possibly make such
statements.

all other designs. Saying that it can't be! Because" "if true it
would have been discovered a 100 years ago" while silently adding "all
is known about antennas and the patent offices should be closed".


Judging by the "IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation"
nobody thinks all is known about antennas.


Regards
Art