On Jan 26, 5:22*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"christofire" wrote in message

...



I can't say I understand much of what you've written above but I'm sure
there are often many ways to visualise the same physical process;

and be glad that you don't understand it! *its pure bafflegab, unless you
really like magical levitating diamagnetic neutrinos that hop off the
antenna to make em waves.

David
Your accusations doesn't bother me. After all, you got a degree by
memorising the books
without checking from first principles for yourself. Choosing from
a,b,c or d is a similar short cut for education without the
application of personal intelligence
It would be suicidal for any student to not parrot phrases and
teachings ennunciated by their professor. He is the one who reads your
work and determines whether you have earned a degree or not, thus
conformity is a requirement. When you stated that statics has no
place with respect to radiation or words to that effect it was
understandable for me as the aproach that I ventured is not covered in
any of the books presently being published. The point that all should
know is that you cannot build a castle on sand, or in other words, all
theories must rest on a sound foundation or findings and since your
degree was obtained by being a follower your reaction to that which is
not in compliance with the books of the day is perfectly
understandable
Take care
Art Unwin KB9MZ.......xg (uk)