On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 10:23:36 -0700, gwhite wrote:

That is clever -- you want me to "declare" something is true that I've
made no reference to. You are quite the inventor. Face it: you had an
incorrect notion about linearity. All the rest of your words are
twisting, squirming, and turning to try to save face after you acted
condescending (and still do) about a very simple matter. That's all.

I have to say I've been wrestling with this attitude problem of kev's
as well. Earlier this evening I postulated to myself that the reason
for all these contradictory posts and arguments over semantics might
possibly be due to Kev's impared usage of English. If the guy's
dyslexic or has some other comprehension problem, he might very well
be an electronics genius but we'd find it hard to tell because this
veil between he and us muddies the water both ways. You view as
expressed above is a very much more cynical one, but I'm forming the
view that one or t'other must explain it. But Kev has admitted to
English not being his strong suit elsewhere on the group and if that's
the case and he really *does* know what he's talking about then I feel
sorry for him. It must be pretty ****ty and exceedingly frustrating
for anyone in that position. I know; I've met a few and it's ruined
their lives.

--

"I believe history will be kind to me, since I intend
to write it." - Winston Churchill