Michael W. Bryant, the totally discredited dufus who once claimed to have a PhD,
wrote:

On Mar 6, 3:37�pm, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Mar 6, 5:24�am, Mike wrote:

On Mar 4, 8:23�pm, Telamon
wrote:

Political and cultural ties sure but I don't know any conservatives that
think the economic treaties between the USA and China are a good thing.

I remember Ronald Reagan suggesting that trade pacts with China would
eventually make sense. You should also remember that it was Reagan who
got the ball rolling on NAFTA and it was King George, the First, that
pretty much was responsible for finishing the negotiations on NAFTA.

- Clinton just signed it shortly after being elected.

MWB 'just' More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.

President Bill Clinton Signed the NAFTA Treaty
INTO LAW [.]
-ps- He could have Vetoed It
-but- He 'Choose' to Sign the NAFTA Treaty Into Law.

Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]

mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF
�.

RHF,

As usual, you're just choosing to be difficult. Though Clinton signed
NAFTA (and, yes,
he took grief from the labor unions for doing so), but it was the
Reagan and Bush
administrations that were responsible for the negotiations during the
1980's.

The responsibility for NAFTA was clearly shared by both Democrats and
Republicans.
Reagan was famous for his prediction that countries that trade with
each other have seldom
fought wars. Yes, even the great Conservative supported Free Trade
Pacts. The Republican
Party has always been bigger supporters of such pacts.

What, RHF, no URLs to support your insanity this time? That clearly
says something..

What about your insanity, PhDufus?

After all, any 'tard boy who'd lie about having a PhD certainly must have a screw
or two loose.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

And, as always, don't let your children attend Louisville Technical Institute.
They've hired at least one dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, and who knows,
there may be more dufi there.