Mike wrote:
On Mar 6, 3:37�pm, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Mar 6, 5:24�am, Mike wrote:

On Mar 4, 8:23�pm, Telamon
wrote:
Political and cultural ties sure but I don't know any conservatives that
think the economic treaties between the USA and China are a good thing.
I remember Ronald Reagan suggesting that trade pacts with China would
eventually make sense. You should also remember that it was Reagan who
got the ball rolling on NAFTA and it was King George, the First, that
pretty much was responsible for finishing the negotiations on NAFTA.
- Clinton just signed it shortly after being elected.

MWB 'just' More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.

President Bill Clinton Signed the NAFTA Treaty
INTO LAW [.]
-ps- He could have Vetoed It
-but- He 'Choose' to Sign the NAFTA Treaty Into Law.

Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]

mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF
�.

RHF,

As usual, you're just choosing to be difficult. Though Clinton signed
NAFTA (and, yes,
he took grief from the labor unions for doing so), but it was the
Reagan and Bush
administrations that were responsible for the negotiations during the
1980's.

The responsibility for NAFTA was clearly shared by both Democrats and
Republicans.
Reagan was famous for his prediction that countries that trade with
each other have seldom
fought wars. Yes, even the great Conservative supported Free Trade
Pacts. The Republican
Party has always been bigger supporters of such pacts.

What, RHF, no URLs to support your insanity this time? That clearly
says something..
Come on, RHF, where are the URLs?

Mike

Top ten, Mike!

The House of Reps approved it 234 to 200 with 132 of those 234 being
Republicans and 102 being Democrats.

I can't believe RHF's revisionist history and pseudoscience approach to
things.

JB