On Mar 8, 2:44*pm, John Barnard wrote:
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*dxAce wrote:

Michael W. Bryant, the totally discredited dufus who once claimed to
have
a
PhD,
wrote:

On Mar 6, 3:37 pm, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Mar 6, 5:24 am, Mike wrote:

On Mar 4, 8:23 pm, Telamon

wrote:
Political and cultural ties sure but I don't know any conservatives
that
think the economic treaties between the USA and China are a good
thing.
I remember Ronald Reagan suggesting that trade pacts with China would
eventually make sense. You should also remember that it was Reagan
who
got the ball rolling on NAFTA and it was King George, the First, that
pretty much was responsible for finishing the negotiations on NAFTA.
- Clinton just signed it shortly after being elected.

MWB 'just' More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.

President Bill Clinton Signed the NAFTA Treaty
INTO LAW [.]
-ps- He could have Vetoed It
-but- He 'Choose' to Sign the NAFTA Treaty Into Law.

Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]

mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF
.
RHF,

As usual, you're just choosing to be difficult. Though Clinton
signed NAFTA (and, yes,
*he took grief from the labor unions for doing so), but it was the
Reagan and Bush administrations that were responsible for the
negotiations during the 1980's.

The responsibility for NAFTA was clearly shared by both Democrats
and Republicans. Reagan was famous for his prediction that
countries that trade with each other have seldom fought wars. Yes,
even the great Conservative supported Free Trade Pacts. The
Republican Party has always been bigger supporters of such pacts.

What, RHF, no URLs to support your insanity this time? That clearly
says something..
What about your insanity, PhDufus?

After all, any 'tard boy who'd lie about having a PhD certainly must
have a screw or two loose.
You want insanity, this is insanity.

Obama's Radicalism Is Killing the Dow

By MICHAEL J. BOSKIN

"It's hard not to see the continued sell-off on Wall Street and the
growing fear on Main Street as a product, at least in part, of the
realization that our new president's policies are designed to radically
re-engineer the market-based U.S. economy, not just mitigate the
recession and financial crisis.

The illusion that Barack Obama will lead from the economic center has
quickly come to an end. Instead of combining the best policies of past
Democratic presidents -- John Kennedy on taxes, Bill Clinton on welfare
reform and a balanced budget, for instance -- President Obama is
returning to Jimmy Carter's higher taxes and Mr. Clinton's draconian
defense drawdown."

Go read the rest of it he
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html

The obomination is looking more like Carter II everyday.

Failed capitalism and its supporters did Wall Street in NOT Barack
Obama. He has the unfortunate job of picking up the pieces.
The stock market disagrees with you in strongest possible terms. It
didn't like Jimmy's policies and it doesn't think the obomination's
policies are any better.

The boys on Wall Street are the ones to be held the most accountable.
Their free ride with Georgie and his clan are over and now they have to
own up. Small wonder they are sh*tting bricks.

The boys on wall street are not responsible for the wealth destroying
actions of the obomination. I know I'm one of the "boys" as you call
them. The market has been down since the obomination won the election
due to his promises to destroy capitalism as we know it. The obomination
speeches since he assumed office have done nothing but inspire fear in
the markets. Those are the facts like them or not.

Those are not the facts if you take a look at the DJIA over the last
year. The greatest drops occurred with GWB in power. And those are the
facts like them or not.

http://www.djaverages.com/

JB

That was a durect result of FEAR of the ObamaNation©
and the onslaught of ObamaNomics© leading to the
ObamaNization© of the US Ecomomy has caused the
US Stock Market to T-A-N-K !
1Obama
2 Obamas
3 Obamas
Four Years of Obama Can We Take Anymore ?