In article ,
dave wrote:

MNMikeW wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message
..
.
In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

ka6uup wrote:

³The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because
they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at
scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.² -
Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of
This is false. The models include long-term variations in solar
output and orbit.
Baloney, this is in the money. The UN panel are a bunch of unmitigated
twits.

This, unfortunately, is not false:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...missions-ocean
s-c
openhagen
More BS. This is not science but alarmism. Congratulations on being
suckered one more time.

Realistic models do not support man made global warming period. Al Gore
is the biggest moron on the face of the earth.

You get an F in science.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/629/629/7074601.stm
This is BS. It is not factual. This is no different than the Al Gore
temperature / CO chart where he misleads the audience about cause and
effect. The IPCC is in the business of selling Kool-Aid to further the
UN global power agenda.

This is all such nonsense. We are actually headed toward global cooling
not warming.

There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise.
Oops.


10 years? That's silly. You cannot deduce a trend from 10 years of
data. Remove 1998 and then calculate. 1998 was an extra hot year, due
to ocean currents.

It's not silly, he is right.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California