View Single Post
  #16   Report Post  
Old March 17th 09, 01:31 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.religion.christian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.news-media
John Barnard John Barnard is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 602
Default (OT) : Russia May BaseBombers in Cuba : Obama-RegimeŠ DoesNothing to Protect America's Sovereignty

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
We are putting missiles on Russia's doorstep. This is their response.
SNIP

They are not nuclear missiles Dave.

They are conventional defense missiles.

For which the effective countermeasure IS a nuclear weapon. The end
result is the same; destabilization and menace.


The nukes on the bombers are offensive weapons. There is no comparison
to a conventional defensive missile. You are not making sense.

These defensive missiles are designed to shoot down an ICBM. These
handful of missiles could also stop ICBM's from Russia but they can only
stop a few at best and Russia has thousands. Since this is the case why
should Russia be concerned? It's not like a Russia nuclear response
could be compromised in some way by them.


It's posturing on the part of the Russians. There's no sense in placing
nukes on a bomber when launching them from a sub. is way more advantageous.

JB