The dipole and the violin
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:18:35 +1100, Clifford Heath
wrote:
I'm also a ham and a one-time violist, as well as an amateur
instrument-maker.
Yeah! I am not alone. BTW I also play viola at a symphonic level.
Never tried making any life is too short to do both.
Jon Teske wrote:
The only time both sides of a
stopped string vibrate is when we play what we
call a "harmonic" and there are several of them on violin strings. A
harmonic is when the violinist lightly touches the string so that the
unexcited side (e.g. not the bowed side) can also vibrate
In particular, you have to touch lightly enough that some energy
can couple into the other half of the string. Some of the energy
is transferred through up-down motion and some through the bending-
stiffness of the string itself. You could see the finger as a series
capacitor to ground, attached to each half of the string by a pair
of resisters bypassed by another capacitor. You can tweak the values
by the way you touch.
Yeah I forgot to mention the energy transfer side of that. Since
harmonics are hard enough to produce in any event, a tunable capacitor
might be welcome. Unfortunately a fiddler has only two hand, both
heavily employed.
I don't think I have ever also considered my violins strings to have
impedance, or reactance, and I haven't quite considered the feedline
problem.
Mechanical impedance/reactance is a widely used idea in mechanical
and civil engineering. The dynamic motion of bridges and buildings
is sometimes even modelled using electronic circuit modelling tools
amongst other methods.
I guess that is the thing they forgot to calculate, or didn't know
how, on the infamous Takoma Narrows Bridge in Washington State which
collapsed when cross winds cause wild vibrations.
Jon Teske W3JT
Clifford Heath.
|