dxAce wrote:
John Barnard wrote:
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
...
MNMikeW wrote:
http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx
Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media
Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What
scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"?
MNMikeW wrote:
Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib.
Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative.
It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question
to ask what their scientific qualifications are.
It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who
are the sponsors of a study.
Oh yeah, your credentials as a dumb ass Usenet poster boy are very
impressive.
And your credentials of pretending to be hot **** when you are nothing
more than cold **** in a Dixie cup are even more impressive!
Gee, that sounds a lot like what CanaDuh does: pretend to be hot **** when it is
nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup!
Cool! Someone let the other Polly out of its cage!
JB