Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:
"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
...
MNMikeW wrote:

http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx
Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media
Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What
scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"?
MNMikeW wrote:

Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib.
Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative.

It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question
to ask what their scientific qualifications are.

It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who
are the sponsors of a study.
Oh yeah, your credentials as a dumb ass Usenet poster boy are very
impressive.

And your credentials of pretending to be hot **** when you are nothing
more than cold **** in a Dixie cup are even more impressive!

On the other hand your credentials as an idiot are very impressive.

What do the voices in your head tell you about the next enthralling saga
of Obama's BC?

JB