In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-52BD51.17534518032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

dxAce wrote:
John Barnard wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:
"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
...
MNMikeW wrote:

http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx
Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media
Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What
scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"?
MNMikeW wrote:

Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib.
Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative.

It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate
question
to ask what their scientific qualifications are.

It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see
who
are the sponsors of a study.
Ignore studies by dumbass Canucks!



The Bible Belt whack you one too many times up the side of your head?

Did you fall down and hit your head again? You must have more bumps on
your noggin than a toad has on it body.


Hey, Polly! Here's one for you to repeat: "Obama has a legit BC. Obama
has a legit BC".

Here is one for you.
John Barnard is an ignorant ass!
John Barnard is an ignorant ass!



But he's not a Obama BC kooktard!
But he's not a Obama BC kooktard!
But he's not a Obama BC kooktard!
But he's not a Obama BC kooktard!

That's almost untoppable, Telemundo.

Yet you are managing to do just that whack job.

You topped me there.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California