In article
,
Drafterman wrote:

On Mar 20, 12:20*pm, "MNMikeW" wrote:
"Drafterman" wrote in message

...

First of all, the bill originally containedl anguage to limit the amount of
money that could be given as bonuses abut this was removed at the last
minute. Details are still sketchy about who and why this happened but it
means that the bill was not constructed with the intention of use as a
diversionary tactic.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------*
---------------

The who and why are NOT sketchy. Chris Dodd did it. As for why? I would
imagine that $103,000 in campaign dough he got from AIG had something to do
with it.

But now of course, he claims he's giving it back, lol!

Unless you can provide why your imaginings should be accepted as fact
then I'll retain my use of the word "sketchy".

Chris Dodd said as much.

I have a suggestion for you, why not read up first and then post instead
of the reverse.

http://www.courant.com/business/hc-a...mar19,0,228131
1.story

--
Telamon
Ventura, California