On Apr 24, 10:47*am, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...
On Apr 24, 7:48 am, Art Unwin wrote:

Please allow me to correct myself on the above

you never did answer my question, but thats ok, you never have before
either... now you try parsing the language and think that provides
insight... just write the equation, what is equilibrium in your mind? *i
know this is tough, you are so far out of balance anyway, but try to amuse
me a bit and write a concise definition of 'equilibrium'.

I will be happy to David
It is balance as referred to by the mathematical equal (=) term where
all metrics can be placed to one side and summed to the value of
zero. In physics it represents the physical laws of Newton and other
where "every action has an equal and opposite reaction" as used in the
time worn uses when establishing a arbitrary border as per Gauss's law
of Statics or Maxwell when determining the absence of metrics deduced
the missing levitational force( displacement current) in his law's or
calculations. All of which were established by observations thru the
years of the Universe with respect to Earth in relative form . ( See
Einstein's law of relativity) This can be seen as motivation of the
Grand Universal Theory which Einstein gave up on because of his
failure to identify what is known as the "weak force" which is part of
the standard model of physics. It was Foucault that much, much later
that found or discovered the displacement current which is what I
determine to be the "weak force" and also the required metrics that
Maxwell added to his equations to represent the measure of
equilibrium.
The above explanation is probably longer than what is usually found in
terms of words but I tried to relate to the evolution of physics with
respect to that same word to provide better understanding rather than
describing it in niche terms of mechanical and electrical terms of the
physical Universe
I thought you were getting bored with physics!
Regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ..xg